| Join our list
|
| | |
Dear
Welcome
to the last edition of
our 'Safety
Matters' newsletter for 2008. For
many of you this has been an increasingly difficult
year and we all hope that 2009 sees a marked
change in the current economic situation. This
month we hope to tell you about the different
campaigns that the HSE are supporting,
information on changes in legislation, current HSE
'Hot-topics' and any 'Essential Safety Product'
offers that we are currently running.
We trust
that you find this newsletter useful and informative,
if however you have any questions about the contents
of the newsletter or require any further
clarification on any of the points raised, please do
not hesitate to contact us on 08453 669933 or email us
at: info@SafetyServicesDirect.com |
| The Health & Safety (Offences) Act
2008 |
|
 From the 16th January
2009 the Health & Safety Offences Act will
come into force. As with many pieces of
legislation, you'll only be directly affected if
you've done something you shouldn't have, and only if
you end up in court! The Act raises the
maximum penalty the lower courts can issue from
£5,000 to £20,000 per offence. If you are
prosecuted by the HSE they usually charge you with a
number of offences at the same time, covering
claims of breaches in all sorts of Health & Safety
Legislation, so the fines can soon add up.
The new Act will also allow some offences,
previously limited to the lower courts, to be tried in
higher ones, which have the power to pass stiffer -
often unlimited - penalties. Therefore, it will make a
custodial sentence an option for a wider range of
health and safety offences.
For further information/comment on the Health
& Safety (Offences) Act 2008 CLICK
HERE |
What breaks are your workers entitled
to under the Working Time
Regulations? |
|
|
The basic rights and protections that the
Regulations provide are:
a limit of an average
of 48 hours a week which a worker can be required to
work (though workers can choose to work more if they
want to).
- a limit of an average of 8 hours work in 24
which nightworkers can be required to work.
- a right for night workers to receive free health
assessments.
- a right to 11 hours rest a day.
- a right to a day off each week.
- a right to an in-work rest break of 20
minutes if the working day is longer than 6
hours.
- a right to 4 weeks paid leave per
year.
For further information on what your workers
are entitled to click HERE
|
| Competent Contractors? -
YOUR
Responsibility |
|
| Assessing your contractors is
YOUR responsibility - are you doing your job
properly?
When we talk about contractor assessment we
automatically think of construction related
contractors such as plumbers, electricians, plasterers
etc and although these are of course contractors, we
do employ contractors not just in construction but in
all types of work related occupations.
Contractors could be your IT installation company,
cleaners, gardeners or simply contract/freelance
staff. All of these individuals need to be
assessed to ensure that they are not only competent in
the work that they are doing but also in their health
& safety practices and procedures.
 You would never use a
IT installation company that knew nothing about IT or
could not recognise a computer; a gardener that had no
tools to do the work; or a cleaner that sprayed the
office with liquid bleach - at the same time it is as
important that these individuals, as with construction
contractors, are assessed with regards to their health
& safety understanding and capabilities - if you
knew that a contractor may potentially put you or your
colleagues at risk of harm as a result
of their activities would you let them start
work? Do you know your contractor is truly competent
in health & Safety?
Contractor Assessment is equally however not
a paper-work exercise although if the 'paperwork'
is not in place or can not be put into place, it is
unlikely that the contractor is aware of the risk and
hazards associated with his work
activities. |
|
Protect Your Hearing or Lose
It! |
|
|
Noise is part of everyday life, but loud noise
can permanently damage your hearing. Young or old,
once you lose your hearing you can never get it back.
You are at risk to hearing loss if you can
answer 'yes' to any of these questions about the noise
where you work:
Is the noise
intrusive - like a busy street, a vacuum cleaner or
a crowded restaurant - for most of the working day?
- Do you have to raise your
voice to have a normal conversation when about 2m
apart for at least part of the day?
- Do you use noisy powered tools or machinery for
over half an hour a day?
- Do you work in a noisy industry, eg:
construction, demolition or road repair;
woodworking; plastics processing; engineering;
textile manufacture; general fabrication; forging,
pressing or stamping; paper or board making; canning
or bottling; foundries?
- Are there noises because of impacts (eg:
hammering, drop forging, pneumatic impact tools
etc), explosive sources such as cartridge-operated
tools or detonators, or guns?
- Do you have muffled hearing at the end of the
day, even if it is better by the next morning?
Generally hearing loss is gradual.
By the time you notice it, it is probably too late.
We want to prevent hearing loss before it happens. You
can also suffer instant damage from very loud or
explosive noises. Take care of your hearing - you'll
miss it when its gone....
For further information CLICK
HERE and for free leaflets CLICK
HERE.
|
| Hand Arm Vibration HAV - Know your Limits
.... |
|
 Regular exposure to
hand-arm vibration can cause a range of conditions
known as Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome (HAVS) which
includes vibration white finger and carpal tunnel
syndrome.
Around five
million workers are exposed to hand-arm vibration in
the workplace. Two million of these workers are
exposed to levels of vibration where there are clear
risks of developing disease.
Hand-arm vibration comes from the use of
hand-held power tools and is the cause of significant
ill health (painful and disabling disorders of the
blood vessels, nerves, joints and muscles of the hands
and arms).
For further advice
on HAV CLICK
HERE or download the latest HSE free leaflet
HERE |
|
Essential Safety
Products - Crashing
Prices!! |
|
We have again sourced
more competitively priced products to ease
the cost and burden of stocking your 'Essential Safety
Products' cupboard!
|
| ASBESTOS - The Hidden
Killer |
|
The HSE have run their
'Asbestos- Hidden Killer' campaign again - but is the
message getting through to those that need
it?
During
October and November 2008 the HSE in partnership with
key stakeholders ran a national campaign to
target tradesmen (primarily plumbers, electricians,
joiners as well as other tradesmen) who are still at
risk from exposure to asbestos. The primary aim of the
campaign was to further raise awareness amongst
tradesmen that they are more at risk than they think
from asbestos. The campaign also aimed to
encourage tradesmen to find out more about
asbestos and the precautions they should be
taking. It is essential that any tradesperson
working on the fabric of any building which is
constructed before the year 2000 receives Asbestos
Awareness Training from a
Competent/Accredited person - failure
to do so may put you, your colleagues and your family
at serious risk!
CLICK
HERE for further information, posters, video clips
and other awareness or training information and
download your start to becoming more informed about
Asbestos and the risk that it poses to you and your
staff.
Did you know that every
week...
- 3 plumbers die
- 20 tradesmen die
- 6 electricians die
- 6 joiners die
...all from this
hidden
killer. |
|
In Court |
|
|
Council fined £75000.00 over Crush
Death
A worker was
crushed to death between a forklift truck and a heavy
goods vehicle at a council depot.
Plymouth
City Council pleaded guilty to not ensuring the safety
of its employees at the city's Crown Court on 21
November. It was fined £75,000, and full costs of
£16,733 were awarded against it. The judge said the
fine would have been higher except that it would have
to have been paid by the taxpayer.
The court
heard that on 19 February 2007, at a council
waste-vehicle storage and maintenance depot in
Plymouth, Rory Littley and a colleague were attempting
to unload 610 wheelie bins from the back of a
container lorry.
Simon Jones, the HSE
inspector who investigated the incident, said the
custom and practice for unloading the bins had been to
lift a worker up on the forks of a forklift truck to
the rear of the lorry to gain access to the strapping
that was holding the bins in place.
After the
doors of the container lorry were opened, Mr Littley's
colleague, who was not an authorised forklift driver,
lifted him up on the forks of the truck. On
accelerating the vehicle to try to make the forks rise
more quickly, the forklift moved forward instead of
upward, crushing Mr Littley between the truck and the
container lorry.
The Council said in mitigation
it accepted responsibility for the incident and
expressed deep remorse. Although there had been other
risk assessments in place, it had not conducted one
for this particular process. It had made improvements
to its working practices since the
incident.
The judge said there had been a
failure to undertake a suitable risk assessment,
failure to supervise the procedure, and failure to
train employees properly. Inspector Jones
observed: "This case clearly highlights the need for
all employers to assess the risks of workplace
transport. In this case, there were blatant breaches
of health and safety legislation. There was a clear
need for a risk assessment for unloading container
lorries arriving at the depot."
The inspector
concluded: "If there had been a suitable and
sufficient risk assessment, I am sure that this tragic
accident would not have occurred and Mr Littler would
still be alive today."
Derbyshire pub landlord
pleaded guilty to 21 food hygiene
offences.
The landlord was fined a total of
£32,000 and ordered to pay £1729, the full costs of
South Derbyshire District Council, which brought the
prosecution. "This was a massive fine for a sole
trader," stated the Council's principal environmental
health officer, Ian Moore.
The court heard
that a visit to the pub by an council
officer on 30 October 2007 revealed that the gas
cooking range was unsafe because a control panel had
been removed and food waste had built up on the gas
controls. The cooker was in an "appalling"
condition, the officer elaborated. "Although
the landlord had had the boiler serviced a short time
before, the cooking range had been isolated during the
service and reconnected afterwards," he explained.
"The contractor who serviced the boiler said he would
have condemned the range if he had looked at
it."
The officer commented: "Duty-holders
should ensure that safety certification covers all
gas-using devices in the kitchen, and that testing is
regularly updated. This prosecution demonstrates that
magistrates will not tolerate oversight as an
excuse."
A
householder suffered serious injuries after falling
through a hatch in her hallway, which had been left
open by workmen.
Perth Sheriff Court heard on 27
November that an 81-year-old woman in Stanley, near
Perth, was having an oil-fired central-heating system
installed in her property when the incident occurred
in September 2007.
The installation was part
of the Scottish Government Central Heating Programme,
the management of which had been contracted to British
Gas Services Ltd. Adrian Newth, trading as Perthshire
Oil Heating, was carrying out the installation when he
opened the hatch, which was located in the floor of
the hallway. Newth left the hatch open and unguarded,
and told the householder to remain in living room
while he went to carry out work on another part of the
property with two electricians.
However, the
woman walked into the hallway to gain access to her
front door and fell down the open hatch. She received
serious injuries to her upper right arm and severe
cuts and bruises to her back and legs.
British
Gas Services was fined £2000 and ordered to pay £2700
in compensation to the householder. Newth also pleaded
guilty to the same charge but, owing to his lack of
means, the court decided against imposing a fine,
instead ordering him to pay £300 compensation to the
victim.
In mitigation, British Gas Services
accepted blame for its part in the incident and
admitted that the proper controls were not in place.
It entered an early guilty plea and said it was very
remorseful that the accident had occurred.
Newth told the court that he was not
responsible for leaving the hatch open and blamed the
two electricians.
HSE Principal Inspector, Jim
Skilling, said: "Both a big and small company have
been implicated in this accident. It is not sensible
or acceptable for contractors to assume that simply
telling the occupant to remain in the front room is
sufficient.
"Contractors must take
positive steps to prevent any incident by implementing
a safe-system-of-work approach, where all holes are
covered, or have barriers to ensure the safety of all
persons, whether occupants or visitors. This was a
wholly-preventable incident, which has greatly
affected the householder, and it could very well have
proved
fatal." The Ukrainian master of a chemical
tanker has been sent to prison for two months after
pleading guilty to being three times over the alcohol
limit while in charge of the vessel as it headed up
the River Thames towards London.
Snaresbrook Crown Court heard on
19 November that Volodymyr Gonchar, 53, was reported
by the ship's pilot as appearing to be drunk while
master of the Cypriot-registered tanker, 'Elousa
Trikoukiotisa'. The ship was carrying liquid ammonium
nitrate from Rostock in northern Germany to the UK on
4 November 2008.
Gonchar was arrested and taken
to Dagenham police station, where a breath test
administered by the Metropolitan Police showed that he
had 103 micrograms of alcohol in 100 millilitres of
breath. The legal limit for seafarers is 35mcg in
breath - the same as that for road users.
Bryan Hopkins, surveyor-in-charge at the
Orpington Marine Office of the Maritime and Coastguard
Agency (MCA), said: "Although the limit is the same as
for road drivers, I cannot emphasise enough the
seriousness of this situation. Captain Gonchar was in
command of a vessel that had a strict 'no alcohol'
policy, with 15 persons on board, carrying a dangerous
cargo, and transiting one of the busiest shipping
areas in the world."
The prosecution was
brought by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) with
legal association provided by the MCA. Gonchar
breached s78(3) and s82 of the Railways and Transport
Safety Act 2003 by exceeding the legal alcohol limit.
The CPS did not ask for costs. Gonchar will be
deported once he has served his
sentence. | | |